In the mathematical field of topology, a topological space is usually defined by declaring its open sets.[1] However, this is not necessary, as there are many equivalent axiomatic foundations, each leading to exactly the same concept. For instance, a topological space determines a class of closed sets, of closure and interior operators, and of convergence of various types of objects. Each of these can instead be taken as the primary class of objects, with all of the others (including the class of open sets) directly determined from that new starting point. For example, in Kazimierz Kuratowski's well-known textbook on point-set topology, a topological space is defined as a set together with a certain type of "closure operator," and all other concepts are derived therefrom.[2] Likewise, the neighborhood-based axioms (in the context of Hausdorff spaces) can be retraced to Felix Hausdorff's original definition of a topological space in Grundzüge der Mengenlehre.[citation needed]

Many different textbooks use many different inter-dependences of concepts to develop point-set topology. The result is always the same collection of objects: open sets, closed sets, and so on. For many practical purposes, the question of which foundation is chosen is irrelevant, as long as the meaning and interrelation between objects (many of which are given in this article), which are the same regardless of choice of development, are understood. However, there are cases where it can be useful to have flexibility. For instance, there are various natural notions of convergence of measures, and it is not immediately clear whether they arise from a topological structure or not. Such questions are greatly clarified by the topological axioms based on convergence.

Standard definitions via open sets

A topological space is a set together with a collection of subsets of satisfying:[3]

Given a topological space one refers to the elements of as the open sets of and it is common only to refer to in this way, or by the label topology. Then one makes the following secondary definitions:

Definition via closed sets

Let be a topological space. According to De Morgan's laws, the collection of closed sets satisfies the following properties:[16]

Now suppose that is only a set. Given any collection of subsets of which satisfy the above axioms, the corresponding set is a topology on and it is the only topology on for which is the corresponding collection of closed sets.[17] This is to say that a topology can be defined by declaring the closed sets. As such, one can rephrase all definitions to be in terms of closed sets:

Definition via closure operators

Given a topological space the closure can be considered as a map where denotes the power set of One has the following Kuratowski closure axioms:[21]

If is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of cl satisfies the previous axioms for closed sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated closure operator coincides with the given cl.[22] As before, it follows that on a topological space all definitions can be phrased in terms of the closure operator:

Definition via interior operators

Given a topological space the interior can be considered as a map where denotes the power set of It satisfies the following conditions:[27]

If is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of int satisfies the previous axioms for open sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated interior operator coincides with the given int.[28] It follows that on a topological space all definitions can be phrased in terms of the interior operator, for instance:

Definition via neighbourhoods

See also: Neighbourhood system and Neighbourhood (mathematics)

Recall that this article follows the convention that a neighborhood is not necessarily open. In a topological space, one has the following facts:[32]

If is a set and one declares a nonempty collection of neighborhoods for every point of satisfying the above conditions, then a topology is defined by declaring a set to be open if and only if it is a neighborhood of each of its points; it is the unique topology whose associated system of neighborhoods is as given.[32] It follows that on a topological space all definitions can be phrased in terms of neighborhoods:

Definition via convergence of nets

See also: Net (mathematics) and Fréchet–Urysohn space

Convergence of nets satisfies the following properties:[35][36]

  1. Every constant net converges to itself.
  2. Every subnet of a convergent net converges to the same limits.
  3. If a net does not converge to a point then there is a subnet such that no further subnet converges to Equivalently, if is a net such that every one of its subnets has a sub-subnet that converges to a point then converges to
  4. Diagonal principle/Convergence of iterated limits. If in and for every index is a net that converges to in then there exists a diagonal (sub)net of that converges to
    • A diagonal net refers to any subnet of
    • The notation denotes the net defined by whose domain is the set ordered lexicographically first by and then by [36] explicitly, given any two pairs declare that holds if and only if both (1) and also (2) if then

If is a set, then given a notion of net convergence (telling what nets converge to what points[36]) satisfying the above four axioms, a closure operator on is defined by sending any given set to the set of all limits of all nets valued in the corresponding topology is the unique topology inducing the given convergences of nets to points.[35]

Given a subset of a topological space

A function between two topological spaces is continuous if and only if for every and every net in that converges to in the net [note 1] converges to in [40]

Definition via convergence of filters

See also: Filters in topology

A topology can also be defined on a set by declaring which filters converge to which points.[citation needed] One has the following characterizations of standard objects in terms of filters and prefilters (also known as filterbases):

See also

Citations

  1. ^ Dugundji 1966; Engelking 1977; Kelley 1955.
  2. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.38.
  3. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.62; Engelking 1977, p.11-12; Kelley 1955, p.37; Kuratowski 1966, p.45.
  4. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.79; Engelking 1977, p.27-28; Kelley 1955, p.85; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  5. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.68; Engelking 1977, p.13; Kelley 1955, p.40.
  6. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Engelking 1977, p.13.
  7. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Engelking 1977, p.14; Kelley 1955, p.44; Kuratowski 1966, p.58.
  8. ^ Kelley 1955, p.38; Kuratowski 1966, p.61.
  9. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.63; Engelking 1977, p.12.
  10. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.210; Engelking 1977, p.49; Kelley 1955, p.66; Kuratowski 1966, p.203.
  11. ^ Engelking 1977, p.52; Kelley 1955, p.83.
  12. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.6.
  13. ^ Engelking 1977, p.52; Kelley 1955, p.83; Kuratowski 1966, p.63.
  14. ^ Dugundji 1966, 211; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  15. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.212; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  16. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Engelking 1977, p.13; Kelley 1955, p.40; Kuratowski 1966, p.44.
  17. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.74; Engelking 1977, p.22; Kelley 1955, p.40; Kuratowski 1966, p.44.
  18. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.79; Engelking 1977, p.28; Kelley 1955, p.86; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  19. ^ Kelley 1955, p.41.
  20. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.70; Engelking 1977; Kelley 1955, p.42.
  21. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69-70; Engelking 1977, p.14; Kelley 1955, p.42-43.
  22. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.73; Engelking 1977, p.22; Kelley 1955, p.43.
  23. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.80; Engelking 1977, p.28; Kelley 1955, p.86; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  24. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.43.
  25. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Kelley 1955, p.42; Kuratowski 1966, p.43.
  26. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Engelking 1977, p.15; Kelley 1955, p.44-45; Kuratowski 1966, p.55.
  27. ^ Engelking 1977, p.15.
  28. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.74; Engelking 1977, p.23.
  29. ^ Engelking 1977, p.28; Kuratowski 1966, p.103.
  30. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Kelley 1955, p.44.
  31. ^ Kelley 1955, p.44-45.
  32. ^ a b Willard 2004, pp. 31–32.
  33. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.103.
  34. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.61.
  35. ^ a b Kelley 1955, p.74.
  36. ^ a b c d Willard 2004, p. 77.
  37. ^ Engelking 1977, p.50; Kelley 1955, p.66.
  38. ^ Engelking 1977, p.51; Kelley 1955, p.66.
  39. ^ Willard 2004, pp. 73–77.
  40. ^ Engelking 1977, p.51; Kelley 1955, p.86.
  41. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.216; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  42. ^ a b Kelley 1955, p.83.
  43. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.215.
  44. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.215; Engelking 1977, p.52.

Notes

  1. ^ Assuming that the net is indexed by (so that which is just notation for function that sends ) then denotes the composition of with That is, is the function

References