This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --BeneEfimero (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some changes to the new article based on the partly serious and justified criticism of the previous article. I have removed controversial WP:PEACOCKs and replaced them with factual formulations. The understandable criticism of WP:PRIMARYNEWS and the lack of depth of sources and reporting (Depth) has been corrected using new resources. The sources used can be fact-checked, I am grateful for factual feedback. WP:TOOSOON's objection to the previous publication was entirely justified. In the meantime, the award ceremony has already taken place and received coverage from several European countries. The current controversy with the Russian Federation and the Moldovan Anti-Corruption Bureau has even increased the relevance of the award. The prize has been in the news constantly for weeks. (WP:PERSISTENCE). Articles that also deal with this topic were therefore also used transparently. As already mentioned, I ask for feedback and a fair chance to defend my points. Wikipedia is a free space and new, inexperienced users should be given the chance to argue their case against established users. A quick deletion without a review process is anything but desirable, as this platform otherwise has nothing to do with a democratic culture of debate.