Gareth Porter (born June 18, 1942) is an American historian, investigative journalist, author and policy analyst specializing in U.S. national security policy. He was active as a Vietnam specialist and anti-war activist during the Vietnam War, serving as Saigon Bureau Chief for Dispatch News Service International from 1970-1971, and later, as co-director of the Indochina Resource Center. He has written several books about the potential for peaceful conflict resolution in Southeast Asia and the Middle East,[1] the most recent of which is Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, an analysis of how and why the United States went to war in Vietnam.[2] He has been criticized for his writings about the Khmer Rouge government in Cambodia. Porter has also written for Al Jazeera English, The Nation, Inter Press Service, The Huffington Post, and Truthout, and he was the 2012 winner of the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism, which is awarded annually by the Frontline Club in London to acknowledge reporting that exposes propaganda.[3][4]
Porter graduated from the University of Illinois.[5] He received his master's degree in International Politics from the University of Chicago and his Ph.D. in Southeast Asian Studies from Cornell University.[6][7] He has taught international studies at the City College of New York and American University, and he was the first Academic Director for Peace and Conflict Resolution in the Washington Semester program at American University.[1]
Porter was active as a Vietnam specialist and anti-war activist during the Vietnam War. From 1970-1971, he served as the Saigon Bureau Chief for Dispatch News Service International,[8] and later, he was the co-director of the Indochina Resource Center, an anti-war research and education organization based in Washington, D.C.[1]
Gareth Porter wrote a series of articles and academic papers challenging President Richard Nixon's statement that there would be a communist "bloodbath" in South Vietnam if the U.S. withdrew its forces. In his 1973 monograph The Myth of the Bloodbath: North Vietnam’s Land Reform Reconsidered,[9] he challenges the assertion by Hoang Van Chi, Bernard Fall, and others that North Vietnam's land reform program caused the mass execution of hundreds of thousands of people. His analysis stating that the real number of casualties was much lower is supported by the scholarship of Edwin Moise,[10] but has been challenged by several writers, including Daniel Teoduru,[11][12] Robert Turner,[13] and Hoang Van Chi.[14]
In 1974, Porter wrote a detailed criticism of U.S. Information Agency official Douglas Pike's account of the "Massacre at Huế during the Tet Offensive."[15] A 1970 report by Stephen T. Hosmer utilizing Viet Cong documents suggested that at least 2,800 persons were killed.[16] Porter claimed that Pike manipulated official figures to make it appear that over 4,700 civilians were murdered by the Viet Cong, and the numbers and causes of death were actually much different.[15]
In 1976, George C. Hildebrand and Porter wrote a book discussing accounts of starvation and mass killings by the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia. This book, Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution, was criticized by author William Shawcross for using Khmer Rouge sources in their research.[17] Testifying before Congress in May 1977, Porter said that "the notion that the leadership of Democratic Kampuchea adopted a policy of physically eliminating whole classes of people" was "a myth fostered primarily by the authors of a Readers Digest book." He said that eyewitness accounts of Khmer Rouge atrocities by refugees were hearsay and second-hand information.[18]
Congressman Stephen J. Solarz called Porter's justifications of the Khmer Rouge "cowardly and contemptible" and compared them to those who denied the murder of Jews in the Holocaust.[19] Shawcross commented that Porter's and his co-author's "apparent faith in Khmer Rouge assertions and statistics is surprising in two men who have spent so long analyzing the lies that governments tell." In response to Shawcross, Porter responded, "It is true, as Shawcross notes from my May 1977 Congressional testimony, that I have changed my view on a number of aspects of the Cambodian situation. I have no interest in defending everything the Khmer government does, and I believe that the policy of self-reliance has been carried so far that it has imposed unnecessary costs on the population of Cambodia. Shawcross, however, clearly does have an interest in rejecting our conclusions. It is time, I suggest, for him to examine it carefully, because it does not make for intellectual honesty."[17]
In 2010, Porter stated "I've been well aware for many years that I was guilty of intellectual arrogance. I was right about the bloodbath in Vietnam, so I assumed I would be right about Cambodia."[20]
Porter believes that 'the U.S. is not primarily concerned with trying to maximize the effectiveness of international diplomacy' - with regard to what Press TV called 'the Syria unrest'- in an interview with Porter.[21] Porter has written in a manner that indicates he believes the Assad regime was not responsible for the Ghouta chemical attacks.
Porter has regularly reported on political, diplomatic and military developments in the Middle East for Inter Press Service since 2005.[22] His writing has also been published in Al-Jazeera English,[23] The Nation,[24] The Huffington Post,[25] CounterPunch,[26] Antiwar.com,[27] and Truthout.[28]
Since 2006, Porter has been investigating allegations made by the U.S. and Israel about Iran's nuclear program,[29][30] and he has done reporting on U.S. diplomacy and military and intelligence operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.[31]
Porter is also the author of several books, including Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam,[32] Vietnam: History in Documents, Vietnam: The Politics of Bureaucratic Socialism (Politics & International Relations of Southeast Asia), Global Environmental Politics (Dilemmas in World Politics), Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution, and A Peace Denied: the United States, Vietnam, and the Paris Agreement. His most recent book, Perils of Dominance, analyzes the role of the military in the origins of the Vietnam War.[32]
In 2012, Porter was awarded the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism, an award given annually by the Frontline Club in London to acknowledge reporting that exposes official propaganda, for a series of articles about U.S. policies in Afghanistan and Pakistan.[31][33]
International | |
---|---|
National | |
Other | |
Warning |
Template:Persondata