Various forms of torture were used by the Marcos dictatorship in the Philippines between the declaration of martial law in 1972 and the Marcos family's ouster during the People Power Revolution in 1986. These included a range of methods Philippine forces picked up during its long periods of colonial occupation under Spanish, American, and Japanese forces, but also a number of new methods arising from the modern technologies of the later 20th century.[1][2][3] These included sexual assaults including rape and degradation; non-sexual physical tortures including variants of electrocution, waterboarding, suffocation, burning, and beating; and various forms of psychological torture.[4]

Documentation

Applying international political pressure on the Marcos administration, three Amnesty International missions were able to speak to political prisoners and release mission reports containing detailed descriptions of specific torture cases.[5] The reports, released in 1974,[6][7] 1975,[5] and 1981[8] respectively[9] have since become a major source of historical documentation regarding torture under Ferdinand Marcos' regime. Accounts were also gathered by Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, the World Council of Churches, the International Commission of Jurists, and other non-government organizations.

Historical background

Ferdinand Marcos was nearing the end of his last constitutionally allowed term when he declared martial law in 1972.[10] First elected president in 1965, he was already the first president to be elected to a second term.[10] Marcos had won the 1969 campaign on the strength of a USD50 million spending spree on infrastructure designed to court voters,[11][12][13] which forced him to take on a loan with the IMF whose requirements so destabilized the Philippine economy that the resulting inflation led to protests and general unrest from 1970 to 1972.[11] Marcos blamed this unrest on the newly-formed Communist Party of the Philippines under Jose Maria Sison,[14] despite both Philippine and American intelligence services noting that the communist situation in the Philippines was "normal" or at the lowest level of concern;[15][16] and on a supposed "Islamic Insurgency",although the armed Moro National Liberation Front would not form until after Marcos' declaration.[17]

For Marcos to continue to act as head of state, his declaration of Martial Law had to achieve seven objectives:[16][4] 1. Control the military and police; 2. Control the Supreme Court; 3. Undermine the Philippine public's faith in democracy; 4. Exploit and abet lawlessness and instability; 5. Exaggerate the Communist threat; 6. Get political backing from the United States; and 7. Hijack the constitutional convention.

In support of these goals, Ferdinand Marcos' declaration of martial law in late September 1972 gave military officers "extraordinary powers" over the life and death of civilians without accountability," and branded opponents as either communists or communist sympathizers whether or not it happened to be true.[18]

Perpetrators

The 1976 Amnesty International Mission Report lists 88 government torturers by their initials, with ranks as junior as Sargeant and as high as Brigadier General.[5] The units of the various perpetrators responsible for this torture were under the command of Juan Ponce Enrile in the case of the Philippine Army, and of Fabian Ver and Fidel Ramos in the case of the Philippine Constabulary (then still a part of the Military, rather than the civilian unit it is today). However, the reports of Amnesty International, Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, the World Council of Churches, etc, all assert the fact that the torture happened as a policy of state, meant to stifle opposition, demonstrate the power of the ruling regime, and terrify the population into inaction. In their 1984 report on "Torture in the 80s", Amnesty International expounds:

"Torture does not occur simply because individual torturers are sadistic, even if testimonies verify that they often are. Torture is usually part of the state-controlled machinery to suppress dissent. it is most often used as an integral part of a government's security strategy. Concentrated in the torturer's electrode or syringe is the power and responsibility of the state."

Journalist Raissa Robles later noted that although Amnesty International made President Marcos aware of the names of these perpetrators, only one of them was ever brought to court, and even he was not convicted; and that most of these individuals were eventually promoted despite Marcos' regular press announcements that supposed military torturers had been caught and tried.

Specific methods

Various forms of torture were used by forces under the Marcos regime, usually combined with each other.[19]

Physical torture

Physical torture was also often inflicted upon victims. Aside from deadly weapons, implements of torture included water, pliers, thumb tacks, ballpoint pens, and flat irons. Physical torture took the forms of:

Sexual torture

Psychological torture

Among the forms of psychological torture performed were:

References

  1. ^ So Why Samar?. Produced by the Philippine Commission on Human Rights with the help of Swiss Embassy Manila for its Oral History Project on the subject of human rights violations during martial law. Samar: YouTube. October 3, 2015.
  2. ^ a b c Pedroso, Kate (September 21, 2014). "'San Juanico Bridge,' other tortures detailed". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  3. ^ Agoncillo, Teodoro (1990). History of the Filipino People (8th ed.). Quezon City: C & E Publishing.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Robles, Raissa (2016). Marcos Martial Law: Never Again. Quezon City: Filipinos for a Better Philippines, Inc. ISBN 978-621-95443-1-3.
  5. ^ a b c "Report of an Amnesty International Mission to the Republic of the Philippines 22 November – 5 December 1975" (PDF). Amnesty International Publications. September 1976.
  6. ^ 1974 Part 1 https://www.amnesty.org.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/pol100011973eng.pdf
  7. ^ 1974 Part 2 https://www.amnesty.org.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/pol100011975eng.pdf
  8. ^ https://www.amnesty.org.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/asa350251982en.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  9. ^ "Amnesty International Mission Reports during Martial Law in the Philippines | Amnesty International Philippines". www.amnesty.org.ph. Archived from the original on 2017-06-12.
  10. ^ a b Clapano, Jose Rodel. "Term extension a threat to democracy". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 2018-04-28.
  11. ^ a b Balbosa ", Joven Zamoras (1992). "IMF STABILIZATION PROGRAM AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF THE PHILIPPINES" (PDF). Journal of Philippine Development. XIX.
  12. ^ Diola, Camille. "Debt, deprivation and spoils of dictatorship | 31 years of amnesia". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 2017-06-26. Retrieved 2018-05-02.
  13. ^ Balisacan, A. M.; Hill, Hal (2003). The Philippine Economy: Development, Policies, and Challenges. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195158984.
  14. ^ Blanchard, William H. (1996). Neocolonialism American Style, 1960-2000. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780313300134. Neocolonialism%20American%20Style%2C%201960-2000.
  15. ^ Celoza, Albert F. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780275941376.
  16. ^ a b Schirmer, Daniel B. (1987). The Philippines Reader: A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship, and Resistance. South End Press. ISBN 9780896082755. Philippines%20reader%20neocolonialism.
  17. ^ McKenna, Thomas M. (1998). Muslim Rulers and Rebels: Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. ^ Mal, Alcade (2017-07-21). "#SONA2017: Chel Diokno's War on the War on Drugs". Rogue Media Inc.
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Chua, Michael Charleston (June 11, 2012). "TORTYUR: Human Rights Violations During The Marcos Regime". Center for Youth Advocacy and Networking.
  20. ^ a b c "MILITARY OBJECTS; JOSE MARIA SISON: A MISSION REMAINS". The New York Times. March 6, 1986.
  21. ^ a b Domingo, Katrina (November 9, 2016). "Martial Law victims: 9-5 is just a number, not the truth". ABS-CBN News.
  22. ^ a b c Cariño, Jorge (September 20, 2016). "Marcos' Martial Law: What happened to one torture victim". ABS-CBN News.
  23. ^ a b Robles, Raissa (2016). Marcos Martial Law: Never Again. Quezon City: Filipinos for a Better Philippines, Inc. ISBN 978-621-95443-1-3.
  24. ^ a b c Marcelo, Elizabeth (August 31, 2016). "Torture victims tell SC of tales of horror under Marcos' Martial Law". GMA News.
  25. ^ "WATCH: Etta Rosales shares the torture she 'hated' the most". Rappler. September 21, 2016.
  26. ^ Pasion, Patty (2016-09-21). "A Martial Law victim's story of healing". Rappler. Retrieved 2018-04-28.
  27. ^ "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XX, Southeast Asia, 1969–1972 - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov.