Robert Sean Wilentz (Template:Pron-en) is the Sidney and Ruth Lapidus Professor of History at Princeton University, where he has taught since 1979.[1]
Born in 1951 in New York City, where his father Eli [2] and uncle Ted [3] owned a well-known Greenwich Village bookstore, the Eighth Street Bookshop,[4] Wilentz earned one B.A. at Columbia University in 1972, before earning another at Oxford University (Balliol College) in 1974 on a Kellett Fellowship. In 1975 he earned an M.A. at Yale University and in 1980 he received his Ph.D. also from Yale, under the supervision of David Brion Davis.
Wilentz' historical scholarship has focused on the importance of class and race in the early national period, especially in New York City. Wilentz has also co-authored books on nineteenth-century religion and working-class life. His highly detailed The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (W.W. Norton, 2005) won the Bancroft Prize. His goal was to revive the reputation of Andrew Jackson and Jacksonian Democracy, which was under attack from the left because of Jackson's support for slavery and especially his harshness toward Indians, including his forced removals. Wilentz returned to the pro-Jackson themes of Arthur Schlesinger Jr., who in 1946 had hailed the pro-labor policies of Northern, urban Jacksonians.
He has more recently turned his scholarship to modern U.S. history, notably in The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974–2008, published in May 2008.
Columbia professor Eric Foner, a long-time friend, says Wilentz "has written some of the very best examples of the avant-garde of the 70s and the avant-garde more recently. Back then we were trying to recover a lost past or neglected past. More recently historians have been trying to integrate that vision into a larger vision of American history as a whole."[5]
A contributing editor at The New Republic, Wilentz writes widely on music and the arts as well as history and politics. He received a Grammy nomination,[6] and a 2005 ASCAP Deems Taylor Award for musical commentary (liner notes) for his work on the musician Bob Dylan.[7]
Wilentz lives in Princeton, New Jersey and is married to University of Chicago historian and distinguished professor Christine Stansell who also received her Ph.D. from Yale University.[8]
Wilentz has prominently engaged in current politics. Wilentz was reportedly a long-time family friend of the Clintons.[9] He appeared in contemporary politics, as a staunch defender of Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton: he appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on December 8, 1998 to argue against the Clinton impeachment. He told the House members that, if they voted for impeachment but were not convinced Clinton's offenses were impeachable:
"...history will track you down and condemn you for your cravenness."
His testimony cheered Democratic partisans but was criticized by the New York Times, which lamented his "gratuitously patronizing presentation" in an editorial.[10]
In 2006, he wrote an article denouncing the George W. Bush presidency, titled "The Worst President in History?" [11] which appeared in Rolling Stone magazine. The article received an immediate national response from conservatives; National Review attacked Wilentz's analysis as "blinkered" and called him "the modern Arthur Schlesinger Jr."[12]
Wilentz followed up during the 2008 general election with another article in Rolling Stone, describing how the failures of the Bush administration had caused a "political meltdown" of the Republican Party, with potentially enormous long-term effects.[13]
In 2008 Wilentz was an outspoken supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton.[14] He wrote an essay in the New Republic analyzing Sen. Barack Obama's campaign, charging Obama with creating "manipulative illusion[s]" and "distortions," and having "purposefully polluted the [primary electoral] contest" with "the most outrageous deployment of racial politics since the Willie Horton ad campaign in 1988."[15] During the Democratic National Convention, Wilentz charged in Newsweek that "liberal intellectuals have largely abdicated their responsibility to provide unblinking and rigorous analysis" of Obama. "Hardly any prominent liberal thinkers" have questioned his "rationalizations" about his relationship to his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., or "his patently evasive accounts" of his "ties" to the "unrepentant terrorist William Ayers." For Wilentz, Obama is untested, cloudy, problematic—and liberal intellectuals have given him a free ride.[16] Wilentz was criticized by bloggers and others for his criticism of Obama.[17] He has also come under fire for the alleged historical inaccuracy of his attacks on the idea of nullification.[18]
Template:Persondata