Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 02:5202:52, 6 April 2024‎ Bon courage talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −124‎ Restored revision 1217460370 by KlayCax (talk): This is still nothing-y; any proposed text should be workshopped on Talk Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 01:3701:37, 6 April 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,213 bytes +124‎ Please see the archives on past discussions, and the current discussion where there isn’t really any strong opposition to including ethics, aside from you. That’s a medical viewpoint on efficacy (and does not really say anything about ethics or controversy). Cultural, societal, and ethical viewpoints are also relevant, and a concise sentence in contrast to a whole paragraph on the medical viewpoint is WP:DUE. Saying there are various ethical views hardly suggests there’s a controversy. Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 23:4823:48, 5 April 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −124‎ Where's the consensus at? We already *do* include it. ". Some medical organizations take the position that it carries prophylactic health benefits which outweigh the risks, while other medical organizations generally hold the belief that in these situations its medical benefits are not counterbalanced by risk" Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 19:0919:09, 4 April 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,213 bytes +124‎ There is a consensus to mention controversies in the lead, and the sentence was actually very mild. Weren’t you the person that initially proposed the compromise? Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 18:0318:03, 4 April 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −124‎ No consensus for this. Undid revision 1216536670 by Prcc27 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 15:5715:57, 31 March 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,213 bytes +124‎ Restore previously used wording to the lead as compromise. Tag: Reverted

curprev 00:5200:52, 30 March 2024‎ Bon courage talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −457‎ Restored revision 1216254101 by KlayCax (talk): Poorly-worded and nothing-y Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 00:4700:47, 30 March 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,546 bytes +457‎ Only 3 of 4 users actually made a policy based argument at the current section. We don’t edit Wikipedia based on personal experiences or preferences. Please see WP:JDL. Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 00:1100:11, 30 March 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −457‎ Are you talking about Talk:Circumcision#Bioethics_of_circumcision. There's not anywhere near a consensus. Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 20:3520:35, 29 March 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,546 bytes +457‎ There has consistently been consensus on this. Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 20:2620:26, 29 March 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,089 bytes −70‎ Prevalence section is WP:AGF. However, it simply repeats what is in the article, with the data now 20+ years old. (The rest of the Anglosphere has significantly lower rates now.) Tag: Visual edit
curprev 18:5018:50, 29 March 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,159 bytes −411‎ Reverted good faith edits by PuppyMonkey. Neonatal circumcision is only the dominant form in Judaism and the Anglosphere. (Where most editors on English Wikipedia likely edit.) Sexual impact is already mentioned in the "sexual effects" section. Tag: Manual revert

curprev 03:1203:12, 28 March 2024‎ PuppyMonkey talk contribs‎ 146,570 bytes +212‎ use of foreskin Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 03:0003:00, 28 March 2024‎ PuppyMonkey talk contribs‎ 146,358 bytes +173‎ seems to be burying the lede Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 02:3802:38, 28 March 2024‎ PuppyMonkey talk contribs‎ 146,185 bytes +26‎ change hat Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 00:3900:39, 28 March 2024‎ LeBossNG talk contribs‎ 146,159 bytes −77‎ No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 15:5715:57, 26 March 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,236 bytes −457‎ There was no consensus on this. Most medical procedures have some level of controversy and this presents substantial WP: WEIGHT issues. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 17:1317:13, 16 March 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 146,232 bytes +458‎ Re-add to lead per current talk discussion and previous discussions in the past.
curprev 08:0908:09, 16 March 2024‎ Bon courage talk contribs‎ 145,774 bytes −603‎ Restored revision 1213519532 by Maxim Masiutin (talk): See FAQ Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 03:4103:41, 16 March 2024‎ Frigyes06 talk contribs‎ 146,377 bytes +603‎ Added alternate name(s) to introduction. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 07:0107:01, 5 March 2024‎ Pi bot talk contribs‎ m 146,534 bytes +103‎ Adding "update inline" template for Cochrane reference

curprev 07:0807:08, 2 March 2024‎ Wikipedialuva talk contribs‎ 146,431 bytes −249‎ Removing WP:POV material that circumcision is "not required for a life directed by Allah". The statement is not supported by the source given, and viewpoint is debated, as many sects do in fact require circumcision. Replacing the quote that Islamic scholars have diverse opinions on whether it is required supported by WP:RS.

curprev 19:0319:03, 29 February 2024‎ FrozenIcicle talk contribs‎ 146,680 bytes +201‎ Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.3]

curprev 16:5216:52, 25 February 2024‎ Prcc27 talk contribs‎ 147,327 bytes +458‎ A brief summary of our ethics section in the lead is WP:DUE.
curprev 01:5601:56, 25 February 2024‎ KlayCax talk contribs‎ 146,869 bytes −151‎ Reverted edit by ShirtNShoesPls. Clear POV-push. Editor is presently undergoing ANI for attempting to push his views into articles. (Alongside similar articles on the United States, Canada, Donald Trump, and other current religious/political hot topic issues.) Tags: Manual revert Visual edit

curprev 17:5517:55, 24 February 2024‎ Rambling Rambler talk contribs‎ 147,020 bytes −1,634‎ Removing recently added, very non-neutral additions to lead. Reducing to a sentence to cover detailed paragraphs in subsection. Tags: Reverted Visual edit