Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There's little to mention on this simple and clear article, which is fully cited.
- "an arcing trajectory": aren't all trajectories arcing parabolas? (It was a long time ago that I did school physics). Perhaps say "high-flying" or "that arc high in the sky" or something of that sort.
- Changed to "hit in an arcing manner"
- Why is "foul tip" both linked and in boldface? I thought we did one or the other.
- The bunt rule seems to be very old. I know there's another article on bunt, but perhaps a sentence based on Snyder would be useful here on why bunts are treated differently?
- Additional sentence added, does that help any?
Chiswick Chap I've responded to all of your points to date. Hog Farm (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, to be honest I think that's about it. It's properly structured and cited so I guess it's a GA. Good work! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]