This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with biological computing on Dec 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Do you have a feel for who first used the term "Biologically-inspired computing"? A quick search of Medline reveals The Embryonics Project: a machine made of artificial cell published in 1999 as the first article in that database.
I really like how traditional AI is described as using a 'creationist' approach to making intelligent systems. I was tempted to link to Top-down and bottom-up design from bottom-up, but there would also have to be a whole new section made at the "Top-down and bottom-up design" article dealing with how "top-down" and bottom-up" are used within AI, rather than just conventional software design. It also is the case that the role of inspiration from biology is almost totally absent from the Artificial_intelligence article.....which is a true but unfortunate reflection of how most AI researchers ignore biology.
JWSchmidt 14:21, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
When you mention "transposition" I think of Transposons and genetics. Do you have some other meaning in mind? JWSchmidt 02:18, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I did add the bit on transposition. Yes, it does indeed mean to simulate the activity of transposons. I would have to find the correct reference, but some recent work has suggested that there in the evolution of evolvability, loci that are closely inter-related tend to get localized together to form modules. This was simulated using a GA that included the transposition operator. Shyamal
English grammar rules dictate that since "biologically" is an adverb, it must modify "inspired" and not "computing" and thus the proper way to spell the title is "Biologically inspired computing."
68.181.248.135 (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Clearly, but that doesn't mean that the hyphen is incorrect ("A definitive collection of hyphenation rules does not exist."). I would argue for the hyphenation because it is a title, and people (often) use it as a single concept. Also, the meaning of "inspired" changes with the addition of the adverb (from "genius" to "derived from"). I'll leave it as is, but remove the condescending "incorrectly."
71.238.37.76 (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Page moved (pending speedy deletion of target). Per WP:GOOGLE. Claimed results below verified. Born2cycle (talk) 23:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Biologically inspired computing → Bio-inspired computing — "Bio-inspired computing" has ~10 times the gHits of "Biologically inspired computing". M4gnum0n (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Just my opinion, sensor networks should be related to sensory organs or senses, no? and i think it's "The Wave", not "the "The Wave"". WHZhang (talk) 05:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Would like to correct the following statement : "quite often completely counter intuitive from what the original rules would be expected to produce" . word "counter intuitive" suggests that , we are guessing something , but it went wrong . But i think it's a wrong statement . As time scale advances , With human brain , We are unable to simulate the behavior of the system , But system reacts according to it's evolutionary principles . So statement should be "quite often difficult to predict"
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bio-inspired computing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Bio-inspired computing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.neurochem-project.eu/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Someone added a merge tag to this article in 2016, suggesting that it should be merged with "biological computing". Is there any good reason to merge these two articles? Jarble (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
I vote no because I don't see how they're the same subject. Bio-inspired computing is about ideas extracted from observing organic processes; computational biology is about programming organic molecules to do things. I don't think I would have found this fine article if it was buried within another, unrelated article about a subject I am not interested in right now. JimmBobbBooWap 08:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2022 and 3 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GreatContributor1 (article contribs).