![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page definitely needs to be expanded. I would love to see some of the more techincal info that is out there incorporated (anti-squat curves, wheel rate...
I also think the "criticisms" of DW-link (like the oft-made argument that it isn't original enough to warrant a patent) and comparisons to similar systems like Maestro or VPP would enhance the article greatly. Laxman2001 (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
The name "dw-link" appears to be usually spelled with the hyphen, so I guess this article should use the hyphen. At least that is how it usually appears on www.dw-link.com (except for the tab at the top of the page and the copyright statement at the bottom of the page), arguably the definitive source for such matters.
How about capitalization? It appears to be written usually in all lower case, again with a few exceptions.
Comments? Better sources? -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
An interview recorded that David Weagle and Tony Foale met in 2005 where David discussed his idea of characterizing anti-squat versus travel in a graphical format. Also, the patent applications published in 2003 and 2004 (information at USPTO), well before the March 2006 second edition of Tony Foale's book (which includes discussion of anti-squat curves) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.24.66 (talk) 19:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
"This winning streak made the dw-link the winningest linkage suspension platform in the history of the sport of downhill."
i lold
it doesn't sound like proper grammar, but i don't feel like changing it, because i find 1337speak amusing 86.45.72.131 (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)