GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 13:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I can take a look at this article later today! — GhostRiver 13:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lede

Origins and history

In the Star Wars Universe

Rules

Significance

References

General comments

Putting on hold for now. Ping me if there are any questions. — GhostRiver 20:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know I'll try to get back to this within 48h or so. Busy days. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GhostRiver, I think I was able to fix all the issues here. If you enjoyed this, please consider checking the GA review request for the twin article at Talk:Sabacc :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I made a couple of additional edits myself, but now I think it's ready to go! — GhostRiver 15:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]