I cut out a fair bit of stuff, some of it was factually wrong other parts were analysis that probably does not belong in a wikipedia article. -SimonP 01:25, Oct 7, 2003 (UTC)
Um, "Although more than 700 European countries attended..." 700??? D.E. Cottrell 00:22, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
My comment would be that this reads as if it's a very poor translation from French. It's really badly written. (User, Mike Friedman, San Francsico, USA, June 29, 2005)
"3 glorious days"? Which 3? Dates might be nice... Trekphiler 10:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based on the comments above, I wonder if I should have looked more closely at the language... I hope these issues have been resolved. Meanwhile, the article also lacks references and a military conflict infobox. If applicable, sections for See Also and/or External Links might be nice too. Though I really like the pictures. LordAmeth 07:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
July revolution is the same name used for 1952 Revolution in Egypt. We might need a disambiguation page. --TheEgyptian 18:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be some discrepancy regarding the dates. After talking about Charles X's ascension on September 1824, the article goes on to discuss the events leading upto the 1830 revolution. The interval appears to be treated as 8 months instead of 6 years. Please read the section Charles X's reign and see if it fits or not. - {unsigned|59.91.241.58|14:25, 26 March 2007))
Although the article is well written, perhaps it is too well written. By this, I mean that Wikipedia is not a novel. As an example, I've replaced the sentence: "It was a hot, dry summer with temperatures constantly around 30°C (90°F). No rain had fallen. The sky was cloudless, the air filled with dust, the heat shimmering. Anyone who could afford to leave Paris for the country already had." by "It was a hot, dry summer, pushing those who could afford it to leave Paris for the country." Perhaps this substitution is not for the best for the writing style, but it is surely better for the lenght! We are not writing here a novel! Basically, we needs facts and historical analysis of events, not literature! As a side-note, I've seen some very well written articles concerning art subjects: but this fits better the entry. Here, we're dealing with a historical events, and readers want the facts quick. Sorry to upset those who will see in this remark some kind of McDonald history, but Wikipedia is not Balzac... WP:TRITE: "Use clear, concise sentences." Tazmaniacs 17:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
"The popular leftist newspaper Le Constitutionnel..." and "...conservative newspapers such as the Journal des débats, Le Moniteur, and Le Constitutionnel..." do not look consistent. --Rumping (talk) 08:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
What does "members of the refused to lend money" mean? It seems a word or phrase has been omitted. --194.150.65.47 (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
How can this article exist without a painting of the bare breasted woman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.27.37 (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Subheading: Charles X's reign. "On 12 April ... the Chamber of Deputies roundly rejected the government's proposal to change the inheritance laws." Could we have the year please. It is not clear whether we are still in 1824, have jumped to 1827, or are somewhere in between.Celeborn78 (talk) 07:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)