Parents[edit]

Any idea who his parents were? 18.26.0.5 (talk) 05:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Raymond Flynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Harvard AM?[edit]

Earned or honorary? This article is all over the place. Can we not have a conventional piece with Early Life, etc, rather than this haphazard mystery? Hanoi Road (talk) 22:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images[edit]

Commons has a vast collection of public domain images of the mayor, and, from it, we're using sub-par group photos in the body of the article. Shouldn't we do better? SecretName101 (talk) 10:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Raymond Flynn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 19:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hello. Thank you for nominating this article at GAN. Per WP:GAFAIL #2, I will have to quick fail this nomination as it contains copyright violations. Specifically, there are copyright violations with the 1993 Cornell source. Per Commons:Hirtle chart, 1993 USA sources that are not governmental works are automatically copyrighted. This work is from the National Civic League, which is not affiliated with the USA government. Content from this source was added by you in 2021, meaning this is not a backwards copy. Comparing Dreier 1993 to the Wikipedia article, here are the copied/closely paraphrased sentences that need to be reworded:

These sentences do not pass WP:LIMITED as they have unique phrasing such as "poised", "could not count on", "strong voice" and "turning around". Although there are high percentage matches of Merry 1993 (Washington Post) and Connolly 1998 (Christian Science Monitor), these are properly quoted. While I have not examined the entire article for copyright violations, I believe that all of the prose cited to Dreier 1993 needs to be re-examined for copyvio/close paraphrasing. I hope you are encouraged to work through these issues and renominate this article to GAN.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.