This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Srinagar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The contents of the Sheikh Bagh Cemetery page were merged into Srinagar. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (October 2018) |
Why is Dogra rule sanatised with no mention of the high feudalism, massacre or anti muslim rule but same is not done with the Afghan rule? A lot of stuff is missing 4lways4ccelerate (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Kashmiri Hindus constituted 21.9% of Srinagar's population in the 1891 census and 2.75% in the 2011 census" TO " Kashmiri Hindus constituted 8.39% of Srinagar's population in the 1981 census and 2.75% in the 2011 census".
Rationale: In the context of the insurgency in the 80s, does not make much sense to bring in 1891 census. Bringing in the 1981 census numbers paints the grave yet accurate depiction of the decline in population of Kashmiri Hindus. URL for 1981 census - https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/31511/download/34692/29233_1981_POR.pdf. Rexkash (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Srinagar district topping the Jist where the Hindus form 8.39 per cent of the population". I believe it should be reverted or edited accordingly. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)