This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in February 2009, April 2010, February 2015, June 2016, June 2019.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
I put the image near the bottom left to avoid "image stacking." But if anyone finds a more pleasing-to-look-at place for it, be my guest to put it there. --Marriedtofilm 03:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As I read the article in its present state, It has major POV issues. Some of these POV edits are mine, but I think the article is out of control now. If nobody objects I'll fire up the pruning machine over the next few days and try to clean up a bit. Davemeistermoab 05:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has the route going to the Canadian border, but the map shown does not. DandyDan2007 21:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, on the map, the route of US-191 ends hundreds of miles away from the Canadian border, and it is astonishing that in over 1 1/2 years, nobody has corrected this map. I would, but I don't know how, and I am not going to learn how to now. I have too many other things to do, such as helping to plan the next satellite communications network.98.67.171.39 (talk) 17:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 191. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have one question. If U.S. 191 is supposed to be a child route to U.S. 91, then why is Route 191 longer? I'm curious to know. 140.198.165.54 (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's the numbering convention, explained here United_States_Numbered_Highway_System#Numbering, although admittedly it's a bit difficult to follow as the first paragraph drifts into a few tangents. In a nutshell the primary routes are two digits, 3-digit routs are branches of the 2-digit routes. As for why US 191 is longer, it wasn't always this way, see U.S. Route 91. Dave (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article says the sections are 1465 miles and 440 miles, but the length says 1623 miles on the infobox. 2603:6080:2D0C:8E86:C425:D706:22C2:7CEA (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Those figures do not add up. Keep in mind, today there is a distance measuring tool on Google Maps that makes this easy, however, that tool did not exist in 2005-6-7 when this article was first written. I'm kinda slammed right now, but I'll try to look into this later in the week. If you want to look into this, most states (but not all) have official lengths with figures accurate to 0.01 or 0.001 miles on the DOT's website. That's the first choice. AASHTO logs can help too, if you can find them. Last choice is Google Maps distance measuring tool, or the equivalent using your map of choice. Dave (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK Here's what I found
Southern Portion
Arizona 516.50 miles (source - ADOT logs from state article) (unfortunately this limits to 2 significant figures, the other states provide 3)
Utah 404.740 miles (source UDOT logs - same source as state article, but newer figure)
Wyoming is the tricky part. I found WyoDOT's logs, but it requires some math as they break it up
State line to Jct with US-89 163.634
Mileposts from jct US-89 to Yellowstone NP 141.310 - 158.820 = 17.51
Total Wyoming miles = 181.144
Total Southern Portion =1102.38
Montana (northern portion) 442.161 miles (source MDOT logs - from state article)
Total miles = 1544.54 miles
I'll update the article. Dave (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]