This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Apparently both this article and Vitthal Ramji Shinde deal with the same person. I suggest they be merged into this one because I have done copyediting, etc. on this. Unfortunately I don't know which spelling is correct. Zariane (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes. This is obviously the correct thing to do. Having two articles about the same person is pointless. Somebody could waste hours copyediting the other article, which would be a pity. If the spelling turns out to be wrong then renaming the article is easy enough. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The sources show that [[Vitthal Ramji Shinde] is the correct spelling. I'll do the merge in the next day or two. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. There was non-trivial article history at the target page, so I swapped histories, preserving records for the sake of GFDL. - GTBacchus(talk) 01:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: Fixed confusing multimove request since this is a request for moving just one page. Note that a redirect will be created automatically at the old title so there's no reason to include the old redirect page in the move request. Jafeluv (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.