Template:R to related topic is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Redirect Template‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template was considered for deletion on 2014 July 13. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Two points:

• All that are needed are one or two shortcuts. The procedure is, if one wants to include new shortcuts, they should first be created and only then they are added to the documentation page. Otherwise, they will show as red links and may confuse other contributors.
• There are good reasons to show all existing redirects in the Redirects section. They are then available for use by anyone who may want to use them. Also, if an administrator does not want so many redirects and wants to delete some of them, they have a list to use for that work. – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 20:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "related topic or term" to "related topic" in the description text: Redirects from related topics are different than redirects from related words, because a related topic or term is more likely to warrant a full and detailed description in the target article. A term is simply a word or phrase used to describe something; terms themselves usually do not warrant detailed descriptions, since Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It's unclear how "related term" is different from "related word" here; this seems likely to lead to confusion of this template's intended use with that of ((R from related word)). Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:R from related word which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove "or related term" from the description This is a redirect to an article about a similar topic or related term. A term is just a word or phrase. As mentioned previously, most Wikipedia articles are not about words, but are meant to be encyclopedic descriptions of a given topic. In the few cases when the target is indeed a term, then it should also be treated as a topic per WP:WORDISSUBJECT. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently a proposal to move an existing WP:RCAT template to Template:R from related term, which currently redirects here. Please comment at Template talk:R from related word#Requested move 30 May 2021. Thanks. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]