Quicklinks
Over-hasty Speedy Deleters CSD A1 Survey CSD A7 Survey CSD G1 Survey CSD G10 Survey Survey Monkey Surveys 1.1-1.2-1.3- 1.4-1.5-1.6- 1.7-1.8-1.9- 1.10 2.1- 2.2- 2.3-2.4- 2.5-2.6- 2.7- 2.8- 2.9- 2.10 3.1- 3.2 -3.3-3.4-3.5-3.6- 3.7-3.8- 3.9- 3.10 4.1-4.2-4.3-4.4-4.5-4.6-4.7-4.8
Other Excellent articles on CSD
Field guide to proper Speedy Deletion Overturned Speedy Deletions Ten Commandments of CSD
v t e

Original Article

pata nahi hai. jisko pata ho to bhej do

Nomination Criteria

A1

No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Context is different from content, treated in A3, below.

Deletion Options

**Deletion Option**
rationale	Count	Percent
Agree with ratioinale to speedy delete.	26	41.9
Disagree with rationale, but deletable by other criteria.	16	25.8
Disagree with rationale, but this is a case where IAR applies.	4	6.5
Disagree with speedy deletion, it's in a foreign language, and being written in a foreign language is not a valid criteria for CSD, (should be PRODDED, sent to AFD, or kept.)	16	25.8

Survey Comments

**Deletion Option**
Common rationale	Count
G1	6

List for translation with a note that may be an A1 or otherwise speediable.
I can't judge that one since I don't know the language. Could be that the admin who deleted it did.
this I'd dleete under G1, unless something made me certain what language it was in - and then I'd check that language's wiki for the A2
I don't think this is a real language. It is either Pakastani or Indian
G1 (unless it really is in a foreign language, which I cannot determine)
Just googling it shows hits to show it is a different language. There are other tags for this.
Foreign language, but so short it probably doesn't establish context in that either. IAR.
Possibly a speedy deletion candidate anyway, pending translation.
G1 would also have applied, but I don't think A1 is blatantly wrong.
It may happen that A2 would be legitimate (not to say A1 would not be), though a translation would be helpful either way... not sure how likely that would be as the language is Galician...
Wouldn't argue with A1, but G1 and G2 also apply (for longer articles, tag with ((notenglish)) instead)
Tag with notenglish, let someone who knows the language determine
Now this is G1/nonsense, but check to see if the author speaks other languages or edits non-English-related articles. If so, soften the warning reminder to say non-English material should be in the proper Wikipedia, not this one.
I'd run it through a language detection site to determine if it's a foreign language or nonsense. (note: you made me choose one of the above, and none fit exactly)
To be honest I'd probably leave this for another admin, since I can't tell whether or not it's gibberish or a foreign language.
send to relevant place for a check

Balloonman's analysis

This is a legitimate foreign language, and unless you speak the language you can't tell if it there is enough content/context. The proper steps would be:

Check to see if the article exists on the appropriate foreign language wiki. If it does, then it is deletable under A2.
If it doesn't exist, tag it for translation and place a PROD tag on it.

More