Q1. Has the club played in a notable league (listed in the Yellow Column)?
Q2. Has the club played in a league at the next highest level (listed in the Grey Column)?
Q3. Has the club played in a national cup (listed in the Blue Column)?
Q4. Is there substantial identifiable media coverage (excluding match reports) about the club in reliable independent sources?
Q5. Has the club played in the past in a competition of comparable status to one listed in the Yellow Column?
Any club that fails the above test is most unlikely to be notable and in the event that an article is prepared it will in due course be placed through Wikipedia's Articles for deletion process (commonly referred to as AfD). In a few instances exceptions could be made (if broader WP:N criteria can be met) but this is most unlikely.
Clubs that successfully navigate Questions 3 to 5 might also be deleted by the AfD process if shortcomings are identified (if WP:GNG cannot be achieved through existing or potential coverage in reliable independent sources).
Any club article that is poorly written and/or is unsourced runs the risk of being taken through the AfD process and deleted for failing to meet WP:GNG.
Q6. Does the completed article generally meet the notability standards set down in WP:GNG?
Q7. Has sufficient time been allowed for the preparation of the article?
It is essential that Editors meet the notability standards set down in WP:GNG when writing their club article.
Q1. Has the club played in a national cup (listed in the Blue Column)?
Q1A. Does the participation of the club in the national cup exceed "de minimis" (very minor) coverage?
Q2. Has the club played in a notable league (listed in the Yellow Column)?
http://kyokushinkan.org.ua/959-v-rovenskoy-oblasti-znayut-za-schet-chego-derzhitsya-futbol.html