Leading principle of this examination:
I'm a common-sense-inclusionist: if the article is not blatantly irrelevant for WP, then it should be kept. "Blatantly irrelevant" means:
Places for discussions:
Future:
Tools:
The article quality regarding religion and philosophy is low. Articles on religion attracts lots of scribbling activity from outside street preachers that disrupts the articles, the articles acquires trivial side information only, and very often POV-pusher user filibusters the pages with WP:SYNTH/WP:OR.
The classification is prototypical, not regular. It is based on experience of perceived (subjective) flaws of the articles in question, thinking according the principle that an article should be readable for the not-quite inaugurated, correct, accurate, informative and present a coherent topic.
Description:
Cleanup:
Todo:
Description:
Cleanup:
Todo:
Description:
Cleanup:
Todo:
Description:
Cleanup:
Todo:
Modal logic has its origin in Hellenic philosopher, including Pythagorus, Plato and Aristotle, who based their dialects on Monism as the concept that ontology can be reduced to either a single detectable substance (called substance theory) and or a single being (the concept of the Absolute).[boink 1] Modal logic is by definition any system of logic that deals with possibility, potential and necessarily (which is dependent on actuality). See also Aristotle's Potentiality and actuality.[boink 2] Modalism is the way ontologically that Hellenic pagan philosophy starting with Pythagorus and following through Plato, Aristotle and Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, analytically and dialectically deconstructed human consciousness and existence in order to represent their view of the monad as the "idea" of God and ousia as the essence or universal of being.[boink 3] Modalistic in the idea of God as of a single substance or being (ousia)[boink 4] called the monad that then emanates sequentially various realities (hypostasis). These realities which then amalgamate with one another i.e. as in the Neoplatonism of Plotinus; the Monad (the dunamis, potentia) and the Dyad (creator, energeia, actus) both emanate the Triad, Trinity (Spirit or World Soul). Plotinus teaching that energy or actus has to have force or potential in order to emanate (dunamis or potential defined as indeterminate vitality according to A. H. Armstrong). These realities coalesce into the material world (cosmos) or Universe. Here Thomas Aquinas in his Five Proofs of the Existence of God starts from the pagan philosophers rational proofs of the existence of the Pagan creator God.[boink 5] Hellenistic paganism's God which is modalist God of idealism. These hypostases appear as a descending hierarchy reciprocally reflecting each other.[boink 6] The Orthodox teach that God is not of a substance that is comprehensible since God the Father has no origin and is eternal and infinite. God the Father is the origin, source of the Trinity not God in substance or essence.[boink 7] Therefore the consciousness of God is not obtainable to created beings not in this life or the next (see apophatism). Though through co-operation with God (called theosis) Mankind can become good (God like) and from such a perspective reconcile himself to the Knowledge of Good and the Knowledge of Evil he consumed in the Garden of Eden (see the Fall of Man). Thus returning himself to the proper relationship with his creator and source of being.
The section modalism seems to be a mess of confusion upon confusion, so let me relate to how I believe:
so the statement
is the purest bombastic bullshit I've seen on Wikipedia: WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, WP:HOAX, WP:NOTESSAY, ... Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Inflating blatantly unreliable data blocks:
A case of essentially benevolent POV-misrepresentation of sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, made articles on a certain theme endemically unreliable.
Another constructive existential intermittently but rarely constructed discourses based on leaps-to-conclusions.
Some supporting-beam topics are systemically avoided: