![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Aleph4 has not edited Wikipedia since July 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:
If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~
snoyes 16:33, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)
I put the POV tag on the talk page of Hannerism because I wasn't positive the article constiuted POV. I wanted people to come and determine if the article is POV or it's just inherent. At least that was the plan. I'm not sure it worked...on the other hand, you did look at it. Does it look like POV? RJFJR 00:51, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
Was merged with Kurdistan Workers Party, the vandalism comment is inaccurate. I am re merging it, thanks. --Cool Cat My Talk 09:28, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Can you please read my comment on Talk:Kristallnacht. Thanks -- Obradović Goran (talk 15:39, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hello. It is rather odd to write [[holomorphic]] function rather than [[holomorphic function]] since holomorphic is, as common sense would suggest, a redirect page pointing to holomorphic function. Michael Hardy 19:13, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Kempler video is now translated, be prepared for an attempt to delete tha will probably succeed. The killers friends' are in abundance in wiki —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kempler video (talk • contribs) 05:43, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi There,
I was looking through some of your edits on mathematics pages, and found what I believe to be factual errors. I can see you've studied mathematics, so I was wondering if you could justify them:
—Sean κ. + 12:38, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
You are an asshole. why did you delete my page? whatd it ever to to you? put it back. jackass.
Hello. I hope you were not affected by my remark on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algebraical quantity that you should have contacted the original author of the article. You already did more than usual by listing it on RfC and I'm grateful for that. I do think that you should've tried to contact the author, but I should have told you that (semi-)privately here. Sorry for that, Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:41, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
did you nominate Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jodi_Eichelberger as an afd? if so i'm confused why you then voted to merge. ((merge)) would have been more to the point. Nateji77 16:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
Can you please remove your copyvio for the listing for Eric Corey Freed? He gave me permission for the text, and even gave me some additions.
Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.236.170.55 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
I have sorted out your dispute re Stiltskin, if you have any more questions please contact me
Best Regards
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TessaSturridge (talk • contribs) 22:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The use of ndashes for mutiple-person names is supposedly standard or up-&-becoming that. "Just following orders", I guess. There's some discussion here:
I did not know how to check for reredirs except to use the "what links here" tool. Is there a better way? Thanks, Jon Awbrey 22:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello. This article is about Wrzeście near Lębork, not near Słupsk. The second village do not have a railway station. CCMichalZ 16:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
understood, thanks
Comment on my reversion by User:Pce3@ij.net moved to Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems. --Aleph4 11:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
hi I'm robert luther-smith; i own all the copyrights on my pages...please put it back on-line!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Luther-Smith (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 May 2006
I removed the text for privacy reasons, it was being displayed on Google and it's irrelevant since the issue is now sorted.
J.
The changes you made state that if "countable" is replaced by "cardinality less than kappa" then there is a contradiction outright. That is not true. Kappa could be aleph 1 and the continuum could be larger than that. In such a model, the axiom is true (it is equivalent to the original axiom) and so there is no contradiction. Perhaps you should consider putting it back the way it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.182.155.215 (talk) 22:32, 6 June 2006
Why is it Aleph 4? Can you tell me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bernard the Varanid (talk • contribs) 18:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Turns out it was Durbin who made that definition up (well-order &c). I knew there was something fishy about it. (John Durbin, Modern Algebra, an introduction)
Thank you for helping me write the Wikipeadia article for ‘Stylistics (linguistics)’.
I think that I got the hang of things – in the end.
I’ve now finished my contribution – give or take the odd minor correction.
I hope to be able to contribute to your project again. I did feel that this entry deserved a fuller explanation.
As for the biographical note, no, I did not write this (but my agent did). I just pasted it in.
I fully accept your guidelines and will, therefore, edit it to a form consistent with your standards and style.
I do feel, however, that a brief entry about my work and credentials should be available for scrutiny, but please feel free to edit accordingly.
Thanks again for all your assistance.
Brian Lamont 18:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Who gave u da damn right to tell who and when to delete pages, who are u anyway, im at m brothers house, and i see u like deleting things, get a life, just go and delete people articles, main im trying to get known, dont do us lik dat bitch, but with all do respect, i said the following... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.20.92.68 (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2006
dont delete no more, or im taking action —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.20.92.68 (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
im sorry, but why did you remove my page i created, is you in charge of this thing or something, i really would appreciate it maam. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AntoineJ (talk • contribs) 01:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC).
im saying, i know u deleted it, are you a regular person, or do you work for wiki, if not, youre just really ,mean, im tryna start a name for myself —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AntoineJ (talk • contribs) 12:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC).
Thanks for moving my subpage. Merry Xmas. Alhen ♐... 02:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your work at quasiconvex function. But note however that a quasiconvex continuous function need not be convex. A counterexample is the function
Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Are you possibly named after the psychoactive drug Aleph-4, by any chance? -Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 01:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello aleph4, I don't understand your formulation in the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem article, but to the extent that I do it seems to be equivalent to the original version. The careful reference in your comment suggests that you were really up to something, but I can't even guess what it is since we don't have the book in Leeds. Could you please have another look at the article? Thanks, Hans Adler (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I have made some additional revisions on top of your very helpful contribution. Could you take another look at Shelah (name) and provide some additional input regarding the Hebrew names (e.g. adding to the Template:Hebrew Name parameters that are now empty). Thanks for your assistance. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your redirect advise. I'm new to this, so by talking to you, I'm testing the communication channel. regards Pini00001 (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for mentioning (in 2007) the relation between Dependent Choice and Baire Theorem on "Axiom of dependent choice". I've read also the proof and feel happy! Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Axiom schema of replacement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Aleph4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aleph4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aleph4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)