Ampmusicrecords, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Ampmusicrecords! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name and conflict of interest[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ampmusicrecords", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright information[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Ampmusicrecords, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation, which is also against policy, as explained to you above.

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free advertising service or a place for companies to tell the world about themselves or their people.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text ((unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here)) at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here)) below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anders Thorén for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anders Thorén is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Thorén until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

These discussions normally run for seven days. If you wish to comment in the discussion, you may add a comment below and I will copy it across. First, read:

JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]