We believe in freedom of speech, you do not have the right to monoplise a wiki page, bully other users, or create false accounts to manipulate or supress information about your organisation. ADL is now watching this organisation and associated editors.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shout Out UK, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 16:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What right do you have to choose or block who edits a page, you should be blocked. Are you supporting organisation that promote nazisim? as Shout Out UK has been alleged to do? so much for free speech.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Shout Out UK. Because of your attitude, expressed above, I have moved to a final warning. Continue like this and you WILL be blocked. Fiddle Faddle 16:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jac16888 ^Talk 16:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be unblocked you need to realise that Wikipedia is not the place for you to promote your agenda, however noble it may or may not be, continuing to make unsupported accusations will simply lead to me blocking your access to the page--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the organisation espouses Nazism and there are sources to show it, that may appear in the article. If it espouses it and there are no sources, then it may not appear. Edits require sources, the more so when they are draconian edits.

Your accusations are offensive, especially in your less than pleasant edit summaries. If you are to be unblocked yo will need to learn how to contribute. Wikipedia has no opinion on the merits of any organisation. It simply reports facts recorded in reliable sources elsewhere. Your diatribes are not facts. Fiddle Faddle 17:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anti-DefamationLeagueUSA, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Fiddle Faddle 17:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]