Hello, BritishTiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> ((cite web | .... ))</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== ((Reflist))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. KejuFuru (talk) 04:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. Do not leave unexplained edits KejuFuru (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zudo (talk • contribs) 08:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion. You are constantly using deprecated (unreliable) sources. There is a good reason your edit's tag says that. Due to this, your edits have become necessary to revert, research more about 'use of deprecated (unreliable) source' to know what sources not to add to a Wikipedia page. If you want your edits to stay on the 'Tiger versus Lion' page, you need to remove those unreliable sources, and for that, you need to research about it. This is your last warning! This will probably help - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources KejuFuru (talk) 04:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
So he has to remove the unreliable source, you didn’t get what I was trying to say Tijkil KejuFuru (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
@KejuFuru and Tijkil: Guys, let's be careful here. This is Wikipedia, where we have to be as WP:Neutral as possible, not like those forums, where we can technically fight our spirits out! Just now, BritishTiger got temporarily blocked from treating Wiki like a forum, so let's take this as warning, and try to be as nice as possible to each other, OK? Leo1pard (talk) 18:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Take a look at this edit here of yours and click the link where it says Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source. You will be blocked again if you insist on ignoring the information that is being provided to you. -- Longhair\talk 10:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Longhair\talk 20:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Longhair\talk 10:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
BritishTiger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not the only person to disruptive editting, gave reasons why I removed unreliable sources in the talk page/edit section, not explained why the sources I used were unreliableBritishTiger (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Longhair\talk 11:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
BritishTiger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just fixed the vandalism caused by KejuFuru, once unblocked I assumed I could go back to editing Wikipedia BritishTiger (talk) 15:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You contributed to the disruption of that article. You may still edit elsewhere, and contribute to the article talk page, where you should discuss any issues. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BritishTiger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am confused why KejuFuru didn't get any punishment for doing equal or even more severe offenses, he thus equally contributed to the disruption too, as it clearly takes at least two people to cause an edit war. BritishTiger (talk) 18:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request; see WP:NOTTHEM. Further frivolous unblock requests will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.