Welcome![edit]

Hello, Calvin411, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place ((Help me)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, North America1000 12:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Calvin411, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Nuclear power in Canada has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian spelling[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the Montreal Metro article. Because it is an article about a Canadian topic, it should follow Canadian spelling for consistency per WP:ENGVAR. Please stop using the US spelling for words like "centre", "metre", "travelling", " favour", "licence" (the noun - "license" is a verb), etc. Thanks for your cooperation. Ground Zero | t 13:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generation III reactors[edit]

Dear Calvin,

you significantly edited the Generation III reactors article with this edit. I tried to find sources that could substantiate your edit regards the lists of the reactors, but unfortunately could't succeed. Could you please write me, what was the source you used?

I'm asking, because I'm interesting in news about Russian nuclear technology, and so I know for sure that VVER-1000/392 (AES-92) is definitely a Generation III design, and that all sources I examined classify VVER-1200/392M /491 /513 (AES-2006) as a Generation III+ design (for example, see Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia, page 237).

Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 07:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Dr Bug,
My understanding is that the distinction between generation III and III+ is foggy and more a commercial one. Thus I put only the latest developments in the GenIII+ category (Ex: ESBWR is an evolution of the genIII ABWR). I choose to put the VVER-1200 reactors in the GenIII category to reflect the idea that their characteristics are different from western requirements. The MIR-1200 and VVER-1500 being versions in "full compliance with European rules and standards" according to their manufacturer.
Calvin411 (talk) 17:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Graphical timeline of Japan's power nuclear reactors[edit]

Template:Graphical timeline of Japan's power nuclear reactors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nuclear in japan[edit]

hi, this modify was made by hand or with a bot? --Dwalin (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota Supra sales[edit]

Thank you for your edit at Toyota Supra. Can you provide references to support those numbers? Are they world-wide or for a particular market (eg Japan only, US only, N.America)?  Stepho  talk  23:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]