|
This is Diakonias's talk page. Diakonias (talk) 10:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Diakonias! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your article on the United Pentecostal Churches of Christ appears to consist largely of original research, especially in the form of synthesis (the process of drawing new and unique conclusions based on an examination of the presented evidence). This is not allowed at Wikipedia. If you cannot find specific clear references to link the history of the United Covenant Churches of Christ and the Pentecostal Churches of Christ organizations, other than some vague histories from which you conclude a link, then the information must not be presented at Wikipedia. I would stick with your original thought and simply leave United Pentecostal Churches of Christ as a redirect to United Covenant Churches of Christ. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello WikiDan61. I have now re-worked all three articles, with a view to addressing your points/concerns. Diakonias (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Diakonias. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is United Pentecostal Churches of Christ. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pentecostal Churches of Christ may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hugh George de Willmott Newman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hugh George de Willmott Newman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hugh George de Willmott Newman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hugh George de Willmott Newman may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:27, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to J. Delano Ellis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doye Agama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doye Agama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of English people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry VII and Henry V (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Independent Catholic churches may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coalville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bardon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pentecostalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Drummond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 19:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Celtic Orthodox Church may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westminster Chapel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Doye Agama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. James (T • C) • 4:52 PM • 05:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I made these edits. Some comments
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
NOTE: There is further talk regarding this matter on the Wikipedia Help Desk talk pages in relation to article Doye Agama. Diakonias (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of Corporate Reunion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bertil Persson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masbrough Independent Chapel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wager and Countess of Huntingdon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Diakonias. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Diakonias. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Apostolic Episcopal Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Per WP:BOLLOCKS. The only reference provided is their website, and I found no evidence of third-party coverage on the internet. The so-called "Primate" of this "Church" apparently also claims to be the exiled Tsar of Belarus, according to his website--which would render anything on "AEC" website highly dubious. The "Church" is apparently headquartered in this man's house, according to the references provided. Retired User:L.R. Wormwood
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2001:630:212:DE0:FD30:3FCA:C63:CE93 (talk) 22:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
RESPONSE: The Apostolic Episcopal Church has a history going back to the 1920s/1930s, founded by Arthur Wolfort Brooks (who lived 1888 to 1948). The AEC has a significant place in the story of the development of independent episcopal churches. Further, from the 1930s onwards, the AEC and its Primates have been linked with the Order of Corporate Reunion. A fairly brief search revealed that the AEC is referenced in the book "The Apostolic Succession and the Catholic Episcopate in the Christian Episcopal Church of Canada" by Robert David Redmile (bishop of Richmond, British Colombia), published 2006. The UK's National Archives website (discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk) lists a letter written in 1948 from the then Primate of AEC Arthur Wolfort Brooks to the author HRT Brandreth (a noted author on the subject of independent episcopacy and episcopi vagantes) and identifies the letter as being held in the Lambeth Palace Library (i.e. the library of the official residence of the Archbishop of Canterbury). Many years ago there was AW Brooks's own book "The Apostolic Episcopal Church". The AEC is listed by the Association of Religious Data Archives (thearda.com) and for example they state that in 1935 it had 23 clergy, 19 churches and 7892 members, and in 2006 225 clergy, 200 churches and 12000 members. Anglicans Online (anglicansonline.com) identify AEC as a church not in membership of the Anglican Communion. encyclopedia.com lists the AEC among the "Independent and Old Catholic Churches". ecumenism.net lists the AEC as an "independent episcopal church". Many organisations that are run mainly or wholly by unpaid volunteers have their office address at the home of one of their leading office-bearers. The fact that the AEC is now rum from John Kersey's home, that does not negate its long history nor does it disqualify the organisation from meriting an wikipedia entry. There may be facilities at his home for holding small meetings, conferences etcetera. Retired User L.R. Wormwood will not be alone in feeling concerns about some of the claims John Kersey makes for himself, perhaps including his claim to be an adopted son of the exiled former ruler of Belarus, and therefore now the successor to the Title. Let these claims be stated, in a neutral point-of-view way, and thereby give readers opportunity to form their own decisions about the present-day Apostolic Episcopal Church, and without denying them the significant story of the organisation's origins and past-history. I readily agree the wiki article needed improving, but I don't consider that an article on the AEC should be permanently absent from wikipedia. I request request access please to the deleted 2018 article, with the aim of improving it and then offering it in amended and improved form for reinstatement. User: Diakonias 29 June 2020
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I request access please to the deleted article "Apostolic Episcopal Church" (deleted 2018). Reason: I wish to re-work this article with a view to improving it. I shall take full account of the comments that have been made. Above, I have explained why I consider there should be a wiki article on this organisation. User: Diakonias 29 June 2020
Hello, Diakonias. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Diakonias. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Woodville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret Beaufort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks for the update of this article. I hadn't heard it had closed. I will do some more digging for any other information and will make some more tweaks to the article. Sadly this is the second recent closure of a United Reformed church building in this part of Surrey, following Leatherhead last year. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)