The discussion about Zech's accusations at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Bob Morley_&_Arryn Zech has not yet concluded (I hope it does as well, but no admin has put a closing statement there as of yet, and an inline note says it will be archived on June 30th), so you are jumping the gun on the removal. That is why I reversed your edit. Please do not reverse my edit. Thanks. Also, considering you are an SPA (as noted in the above mentioned discussion), I have to question your motives with your edit, to be perfectly honest. Historyday01 (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know the discussion is not officially closed. But in case of doubt, claims should not be included. That that reference is still there when there are other resources is a way that I consider unethical to include the allegations without the discussion having been closed. Editngwiki (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I read the reason and it only says it's a little better. I think the situation deserves a stronger argument. The point against its inclusion is much stronger since mentioning dailydot's article implies including the claims by way of references, leading readers to read those claims. By including them, the editor is telling readers that that's a solid and credible source when that is precisely what has been discussed on the noticeboard, a discussion that is pending closure. As I said before, this somewhat arbitrary reluctance to include it is what seems suspicious to me (not to mention the tension between you and another editor, which makes me think that there is some bias in favor of Zech), especially when clearly there is another alternative resource to refer to her sexuality, a resource that you yourself considered good in that same article in a previous edition.
Either way, let's keep discussing this on the talk page or noticeboard where others can contribute. We clearly disagree on this and would like to see what perspective others have. Editngwiki (talk) 21:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I wouldn't disagree with you that there is tension in this discussion, and feel there are those who favor and oppose Zech, which is understandable. I will say briefly that this would rather discuss this on the Noticeboard, while adding there has already been sufficient discussion on there, and am hopeful the discussion can be resolved soon, so this can put behind everyone, with a closure by an admin or a non-involved user. Otherwise, I made more of a comment on the Noticeboard. I recommend you go there to air your views rather than talking about it here. Historyday01 (talk) 22:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]