The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Vinland has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
((unblock-un|your new username here))
on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.((unblock|Your reason here))
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)((unblock-un|your new username here}PteHook
Fuckwitt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Accept reason:
Yes, you are right. I am sorry, I am guilty. I apologise to all those that I insulted. I value Wikipedia (despite it's eternally flawed veracity). I was in high personal pain and anger at the time of my disruption, which is not a validation, but merely an explanation. Thankyou for releasing me Jamie.
Cheers dude.Fuckwitt (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Okey Dokey Botey Wotey.
Yes, ok. I'll get on to it. Fuckwitt (talk) 15:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I didn't quite know how to do it, and I was lazy. Otherwise I cannot see how posting on a talk page area from a POV that is anti-"semitic" as you claim, is worthy of any attention at all. I haven't read all about Wikipedia, but even if it has been cowered into a Current Conformity position of officially excluding text that is anti-semitic, or anti anything, I consider that this should be challenged at every instance. The issue of offense is also a subjective creation in the mind of the beholder, not a creation of the author, and the implication that users must not write anything that others can be offended by is as ludicrous as your highlighting of 'anti-semitic remarks' as an issue. Furthermore, I challenge you to demonstrate that my "anti-semitic" -(I think you mean anti-Jew, or religiously factual) remarks are factually incorrect. While you may be doing a neccesary job well and correctly in blocking me for my user name, you do not have the right to control others contributions to Wikipedia, even though you have the authority. "I believe I made it clear that your unblock was conditional on your not continuing to edit in such unacceptable ways" -Unacceptable to who? Tell me why you have the right to decide that?
Hello again George William Herbert, I am interested to know of the justification for your identification and designation of me as a 'suspected abusive user of one or more accounts'. As with your fellow editors you are able to follow all of my activity on Wikipedia, and they would all concur with the obvious opinion that there is no evidence or suggestion at all that I have used accounts abusively, or have used multiple accounts. I suggest that the only possible situation here is that you are deliberately slandering me in a cheap attempt to exclude me from Wikipedia because I do not conform with your world-view. It remains to be determined -who will hold you to account? Who will be the editor (or slanderer) of your opinions?Fuckwitt (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)