|
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
O3000 (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry you don't like the truth.03:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Guitarguy2323 (talk)
Nah just lefties :)Guitarguy2323 (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Please do not remove George W Bush from the Republicans who oppose Trump without a reliable source that denounces the New York Times article. Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Republicans who oppose the 2020 Donald Trump presidential campaign, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
LOL So if the New York Times said everyone should Jump off a cliff you would dispute that. So I guess the office of a president is no longer a reliable source :DGuitarguy2323 (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Once again, this was not the office of the president. This was the Texas tribune reporting what a spokesman said. If you have a source citing a website of the president or something like that, then please bring it up. Your analogy is humorous but definitely is not what this argument is about. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
I hope this clarifies it. I did not mean to discourage you from editing, but your continual deletion was not based on a reliable source. Feel free to continue to make constructive edits. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
This [[1]] violates wp:npa, please reword it.Slatersteven (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
[2][3][4][5] Conduct like that is unacceptable, and Wikipedia does not allow people to continue to edit if they are only here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Someone needs to call you out.Guitarguy2323 (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
NoGuitarguy2323 (talk) 21:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Guitarguy2323. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
El_C 05:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)