Thanks for creating 1920 Kerry Senior Football Championship. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikieditor019 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1920 Kerry Senior Football Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kerryguy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikieditor019 (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I still don't see sourcing for all statements. For example, "GAA activities were suspended due to the ongoing Irish War of Independence and the championship was abandoned at the semi-final stage" is not backed up the source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1920 Kerry Senior Football Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel i have enough sources and won't be finding anymore Kerryguy (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gabriel Casey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's more than enough sources covering everything as far as i'm concerned. Kerryguy (talk) 12:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Denis O'Sullivan (Kerry Gaelic footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published. The sources do not support the text. Much of the text (and sources) appear to be about a different subject. Many of the linked sources do not mention the subject or otherwise support the text. The article needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show that the text is verifiable and that the subject meets WP:GNG. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 00:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unlees you're not able to read all the sources mention the subject. Considering you've more than likely no idea what the subject is even about how do you know what sources should be even used? Kerryguy (talk) 06:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know whether you've read the editing and etiquette guidelines but in terms of:

• RE: "you've more than likely no idea what the subject is even about". The subject, similar to the hundreds of other GAA player/team/competition articles I have on my watchlist and have contributed to over the last 18 years, is a Gaelic footballer called Denis O'Sullivan.
• RE: "all the sources mention the subject". No. They don't. Not only does much of the text refer to a Gaelic footballer called Burrows (and not O'Sullivan), but this webpage and this one make ZERO mention of O'Sullivan and do not support the text they sit alongside.

Please see the tags and concerns I raised on the draft article. And consider re-reading the guidelines on responding to concerns raised by other editors (including why making snide and unfounded comments about another editor's ability to read is problematic relative to WP:NPA ). Guliolopez (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you were to actually read the sources you'd see it does in fact mention the subject.Anyway i'm notgoing to redo it again. There's plenty of sources there and it's not my issue if you don't look at them. Kerryguy (talk) 06:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's not enough independent, secondary sources to show that a Wikipedia article can be supported. Are there any additional newspaper articles on him?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriel Casey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 21:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how many more you need. As i said as far as i'm concerned there's more than enough. If you want more then i suggest you get them yourself. Kerryguy (talk) 10:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kerryguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1920 Kerry Senior Football Championship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kerryguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gabriel Casey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't think the sources give much information than just the statistics, which is avilable for every sportperson.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriel Casey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not happy when i suggest you find your own sources Kerryguy (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kerryguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Denis O'Sullivan (Kerry Gaelic footballer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kerryguy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Denis O'Sullivan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]