Hello, I'm Jklamo. Your recent edit(s) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jklamo (talk) 12:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jklamo (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roseau, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jklamo (talk) 11:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Victoria, Hong Kong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kowloon is not an island Matthew hk (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto regarding your edit on Kowloon Peninsula. Matthew hk (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Misplays555! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Seems that you are mixing up the two cities. - 4ing (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After reading this user talk page, @4ing:, consider to send level 3/4 warning to Misplays555 instead. Or report to WP:AIV as vandalism-only account. Matthew hk (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Golden peacock finance centre, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Matthew hk (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:List of tallest buildings in Roseau, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Matthew hk (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]