 Archives |
|
|
|
|
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
|
| For your extraordinary work on articles related to Paris Saint-Germain. Happy to have you in community. Keep up the good work!!! Kokoeist (talk) 16:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
|
- @Kokoeist: Can't believe I forgot to respond to this. Thank you so much! Thanks as well for your outstanding work on PSG articles too. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
im blue 188.253.226.161 (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Paul, thanks for noticing that my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mestre_Sapo needs cleanup, please could you be more specific?
Cheers, Daniele DanieleGamba1995 (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @DanieleGamba1995: Sure! Firstly, the citations go after the periods. Next, you might want an WP:Infobox (most biographies have them). I saw that you also did some editing since I reviewed it so those are all my suggestions for now. I'm not sure if your submission will get accepted but now it has a better chance of, for sure. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Dear Paul, thanks a lot, I just implemented your good advice, let me know if any other. What are possible issues that might cause my submission to be declined? DanieleGamba1995 (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @DanieleGamba1995: Yes, you need to make sure demonyms like "Brazilian" are capitalized, and you might want to create sections. Also use proper date format for Brazil. Take a look at some other Wikipedia articles and try to see what they do.
However, the reason I think the article will be declined is because you need to follow WP:NPOV. Words like "important", "major", "great", etc need to be supported by sources. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- And even if supported by sources, it needs to have an encyclopedic tone, not a positively-skewed tone towards the person. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thanks, you're very right. I think I have fixed this issue by rewriting the article in a formal tone, avoiding any kind of praise and sticking just to objective, verifiable historical facts. Do you think that in this way the Draft can become acceptable? In the next days I'll continue working on the minor issues. DanieleGamba1995 (talk) 17:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @DanieleGamba1995: Now of course, the question of the subject's notability is important. I just gave you tips on the content of the article. I'm not sure about the notability. That's the next reviewer's job to decide. Good luck with your article! Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- thanks! DanieleGamba1995 (talk) 09:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
