Stop vandalising. are you a sockpuppet. If so your real identity will be punished for it, --SqueakBox 18:15, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

No. It is you who will be blocked. SquealingPig

Que tal Madrid? --SqueakBox 18:25, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

Very well.

I believe SquealingPig is a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet of Zapatancas (talk · contribs) --SqueakBox 19:44, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

blocked as a sockpuppet created for the purpose of annoying another user. dab (ᛏ) 18:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

==Relation to Zapatancas== *Here Zapatancas reverts SqueakBox for the first time at Zapatero's years as an opposition leader as of 09:35, May 5, 2005.

• Here as of 10:23, May 5, 2005 Zapatancas reverts a huge amount of SqueakBox's work at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.
• Here as of 10:47, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig comes along making a simple statement that betrays his non native English speaking origins.
• Here as of 10:54, May 5, 2005 squeakBox responds in a civil manner *Here as of 11:00, May 5, 2005 SqueakBox reverts Zapatero's years as an opposition leader back to being a redirect. Instead of debating or reverting.
• Here as of 12:02, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig vandalises SqueakBox's user page, and then proceeds to do so another 7 times
• here
• here
• here
• here
• here
• here
• and here.

He was then blocked and has now been permanently blocked. It simply is not credible that this nasty troll was not Zapatancas, who already had 2 accounts (Zapatero and Zapatancas, though Zapatancas is nopt a sock of Zapatero), the language used is the same and he has kept up the virulenmt hatred towards me ever since, SqueakBox 15:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,

Incidentally, how is a blocked user supposed to 'add evidence to the evidence sub-page' or 'contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page'? Cynical 21:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He has already contributed amply, indeed it was he who brought the case to the arbcom. Please dont clutter this page with silly questions, SqueakBox 02:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]