• Hello TonalHarmony. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jay Richards, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

• Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Jay Richards. Thank you.
• And may I suggest that, in addition to the two policies cited above, you also familiarise yourself with WP:NOR & WP:V, as your comments on Talk:Jay Richards display a woeful lack of familiarity with them.

Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken, and I apologize, but as you may notice I did not make any edits; not wishing to act more forwardly than I did, I left the article's body alone. Nonetheless, Richards is not at the Acton Institute anymore. It makes little sense to make a mountain of a molehill when a ten-second phone-call can answer the question, which is why I was quite frankly puzzled as to why anyone would kick up a row about such a detail. TonalHarmony (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]