Izehar (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding this edit summary [1]: regardless of any disagreement on content please do not engage in personal attacks and incivil assumptions of bad faith, these are not acceptable in wikipedia. Please review WP:AGF WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL before proceeding. Make your case, but don't attack the other person. Thanks. --Doc ask? 17:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
It's good to have you around on the 'Jesus" pages. Once you get the hang of the "can you cite that" questions - which are a good thing and keep the article pretty on track - real changes can be made and most editors are happy to accept a obviously NPOV compromise. Just remember - the "cite" thing works both ways - if you're not sure ask where they got their reference from! SophiaTalkTCF 18:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, TrumpetPower! Regarding a recent edit you made, I'd just like to tell you that the Arbitration Committee ruled that AD and CE are both acceptable, and that editors are not to start changing what is already there. (The same goes for American and British spellings, by the way.) Please respect that. Thanks. AnnH ♫ 20:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Just to inform you...you have been reported for violation (with Str1977) of the 3 revert rule...you can see the report here. KHM03 (talk) 22:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ben - I've decided to put an RfC together about the behaviour of the editors on the Christianity/Historical/Historicity/Jesus-Myth pages. I've had enough of this "give us quotes - no they're no good" wheel warring that is going on - this isn't the first time this has happened. If we are going to have the scholar vs scholar fight we need an external referee. If you have a chance take a look at the references they give. Bede.org and bible college research backs up a lot of it so if that's how they want to play things it could get interesting. SophiaTalkTCF 13:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
The sentence fragment you added..."...established critical scholarship maintains that the passage refers to docetism, which they consider an unrelated issue..." is a bit confsuing to me...who are "they"? Maybe you could clarify the language a bit. Thanks...KHM03 (talk) 15:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
User:TrumpetPower!/Jesus as Mythical Creation, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TrumpetPower!/Jesus as Mythical Creation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TrumpetPower!/Jesus as Mythical Creation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 15:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)