The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus for this DGG ( talk ) 07:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2 card spy[edit]

2 card spy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not technically a CSD candidate and the author has contested that deletion so I'll bring it here. Plainly something made up one day. — Joseph Fox 07:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I know WP:GOOGLEHITS is an anti-argument, but seriously, this doesn't even get any Google hits. It's made up. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete unreference non-notable poker variant at best. looks to be a hoax[1] ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡^Talk 02:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I think I tried to speedy it as a hoax. --Σ _{^talkcontribs} 18:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.