The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, but feel free to merge any significant information. Jayjg (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems that under its earlier names, it does have some history and some coverage. Always best to consider name changes over the years. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 06:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not a listed building (i searched the official website and found 2 former cinemas in Bournemouth but not this one), and there are approximately 374,000 listed buildings in England. The last 3 of the find sources searches added by MichaelQSchmidt above are too general as they are names of entire chains; adding 'Bournemouth' to them finds no significant coverage in independent reliable sources i can spot. The reference added to the article is not a reliable source. Qwfp (talk) 07:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't be surprised if this building meets notability from pre-internet sources. However, since we don't declare things notable based on what sources there might be out there, I suggest we Merge the basic information into Bournemouth#Recreation. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.