The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: Notable company [1] and per sources in the article. --lTopGunl (talk) 01:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - How is the company non-notable? Sources in the article certainly suggest notability [2], [3]. This nomination is very vague in its wording. Could you further qualify the rationale to remove this article from the encyclopedia? Northamerica1000(talk) 13:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't find (or see in the article) anything of any substance about the company. Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:NCORP. It looks like this article's number is up! Sionk (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 02:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.