The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus is they do not yet meet CORP. Star Mississippi 23:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aamir Khan Productions[edit]

Aamir Khan Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is currently a catalog that roughly reproduces Aamir Khan filmography. The two critical appraisals of the body of work (this and this) belong there as well. Other sources available amount to nothing more significant than routine announcements and thus do not pass WP:NCORP. hemantha (brief) 05:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. hemantha (brief) 05:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. hemantha (brief) 05:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. hemantha (brief) 05:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 08:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This company has produced several notable films. I would be inclined to keep this article. Venkat TL (talk) 11:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The applicable notability guideline WP:NCORP is stricter than even WP:GNG. Perhaps this could be converted into a list (which it de facto is, even now) but I haven't yet thought through WP:NLIST applicability. hemantha (brief) 12:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it fails the notability guidelines for companies. The only thing that might work for notability is films that they have produced being notable, but most of their films aren't notable and the article would still have to be more then a glorified directory listing even if there was more then only a few films that are notable. At this points essentially what it is though, a glorified directory listing of trivial information. So I'm going with delete. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.