The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 19:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulfez[edit]

Abdulfez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Probable hoax. Searches for sources have failed to yield anything verifying the article. Nrswanson (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless independent third party sources verifying this article's content can be produced.Broadweighbabe (talk) 03:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.Inmysolitude (talk) 08:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed; appears to be a hoax, as nothing returns to verify it. Cheers. I'^mperator 01:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I see Broadweighbabe put this back after it had been relisted. Is everyone ok with this? I don't personally care either way. I think enough people have commented to delete WP:Snow but no rush is necessary either.Nrswanson (talk) 04:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.