The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ffm 18:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiente[edit]

Ambiente (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Seems like a non-notable internet magazine. A brief search finds nothing to meet our notability policies at WP:N. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I've asked for speedy deletion under db-corp - no assertion of notability for organisation. Exxolon (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can remove the speedy tag for nn if you want but 50% of the text is a copyvio so I've renominated under that criteria. Exxolon (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • If that's so, remove 50%. It's now but a stub and I declined it again. There is no copyvio there anymore. SoWhy 18:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No claim of notability and no sources here. --Lockley (talk) 23:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - no assertion of notability in current (noncopyvio) version; no sources, either. B.Wind (talk) 04:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.