The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andranik Alexanyan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alexanyan appears to be only boderline notable for taking part in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2009 where he placed fifth (WP:1E). As such all of the relevant information for this can easily be included in both that article or the more specific Ukraine in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2009 article. I cannot find additional information regarding subsequent notable endeavors, if there are any. While this article has a lot of information, it's rather trivial and largely unsourced, including things like he's an "optimist". The bulk of the article was written in 2009 with nearly all changes since then being related to formatting. Grk1011 (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per several other AFDs of child singers, actors etc. who did not have career beyond 1E. Geschichte (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep : This article should be a stub.StephenWilliams021 (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Geschichte (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To editor StephenWilliams021: The consequence of a topic not being notable is that it isn't eligible for an article at all, not that it isn't eligible for a full-length one. Only if the topic were found to be notable after all, would reducing the article to a stub for other reasons—unsourced assertions, unencyclopedic trivia, biased or subjective content—be a possible outcome. Largoplazo (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After over twelve years of the article's existence it remains entirely unsourced and notability not shown. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.