The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew James Hartsfield[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I triggered this AFD through new page reviewer tools and am not sure if the bot will place the given reasoning here so I'm recapping it. The main reason for nomination is for failing notability. None of the references cover him, they are just places that mention him or have a sentence on him. The content of the article is just resume type material. Two other editors have tagged this as suspected undisclosed paid editing. Obviously written by an experienced editor, but this user name has only edited this article, and the user name appears to have been generated from the subject/title of the article. North8000 (talk) 21:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Glorified CV. Theroadislong (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No major achievements or significant coverage to establish WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. - The9Man | (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As nominator, for reasons given there North8000 (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL. He seems to be just an ordinary fund manager and small business owner. Several of the sources cited are mere listings, or are tangentially about him but really about the company he works for. I've found nothing online that shows much of coverage' and zero news articles about him. In 2006, posting a resume with a host of bare URLs or brief listings was excusable. Everybody in 2020 knows we're a charity, not a resume service. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly a vanity page and fairly certain to have been paid for. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another article on a non-notable businessman created for clout. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.