The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Ledesma Jayme[edit]

Antonio Ledesma Jayme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable subject, WP:COI User234 (talk) 06:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "provincial governor and assemblyman in the Philippines" with a variety of sources. If the claim is that the sources don't back up the text, that needs explaining. Rd232 ^talk 09:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sources don't back up the text indeed. And the bulk of the article has been copied and pasted from an NHI pdf file. User234 (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link? Rd232 ^talk 15:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Rd232. "Antonio Jayme" seems to be a good search term, though there's another Antonio Jayme in Californian history. I'm curious what the alleged conflict of interest is. --Chris Johnson (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Jayme lent his John Hancock to ratify a constitution to form a new government after Spanish defeat (http://www.zambotoday.com/index.php?/archives/1227-Zamboanga-The-Greatest-Republic-in-History-Part-10.html) ... Thank you, Rd232, for deleting uncivil comments made by an editor here earlier.Samito1050 (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The subject meets the ff. guidelines for notability for a politician: (1.) People who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges. (2.) Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city. (3.) Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article." Samito1050 (talk) 05:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.