The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 21:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apakhana[edit]

Apakhana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

After going through various "citations" and finding them to be irrelevant, I've finally realized why I felt this article was a mess in the first place. It's a poor attempt at a disambiguation page for various DICTDEF'S. Delete. (I actually haven't finished going through and eliminating "citations" that have nothing to do with the topic/no mention of) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 07:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No references found in Google other than some obscure forum pages dealing with gnosticism. No reference found relating to other fields of interest. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - none of the material in the article appear to be a good start for any one of the concepts. -- Whpq (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.