The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archailect[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and appears to fail WP:GNG, fictional minutia that is non-notable outside of a single fictional universe.

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for both articles, but in general I strongly advice creating separate AfDs for each. But here yes, both seem to fail NFICTION/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, both articles fail GNG, as they are sourced entirely to primary sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.