The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus to delete following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arif Rind Baloch[edit]

Arif Rind Baloch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN is only a member of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and yet to hold office in Provincial or national legislature. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 13:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 13:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Being an organizer for a political party does not confer an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL — political parties typically have thousands of organizers and volunteers working for them, so they can't all be automatically notable on that basis in and of itself — but this article makes no claim that he's held any office which would clear the bar. And the sourcing here is dependent almost entirely on primary source confirmation of his existence on the websites of directly affiliated organizations, with virtually no reliable source coverage of the type it would take to pass WP:GNG. Also, straight WP:AUTOBIO if you check the creator's username — but people aren't allowed to get into Wikipedia by writing about themselves. No prejudice against recreation in the future — by somebody other than the subject himself — if he ever actually wins election to a notable office, but Wikipedia is not a public relations platform or a LinkedIn clone. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Nom and Bearcat.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not meet WP:NPOL, and is insufficient coverage for WP:BIO/WP:GNG. /wiae /tlk 18:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as currently questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 18:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.