The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Artists who died at 27[edit]

Someone started an article called The 27 Club. I saw the article, moved it to a seemingly more appropriate title, then attempted to expand and improve the content. However, the farther I got, the less noteworthy the article felt. Pick any age, and you'll find a number of folks who died at that age. It doesn't seem like a suitable topic for an article. ChrisB 08:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but the whole point of the article was that it was the legacy of The 27 Club, Made of world famous artists who made The 27 club what it is, a phenominon, a phenominon that deserves a page on wikipedia. As Artists who died at 27, it needed deleting, but as The 27 Club, it did not. User:Oxen Rockler 19:04, 21st January 2006

• Delete as pointless. Wikipedia is not a random collection of information. —Cleared as filed. 13:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Cleared as filed. Crunch 14:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Interesting, but ultimately just trivia and not encyclopedic. Sure the facts are verifiable, but then the facts are all available elsewhere. --Doc ^ask? 15:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete trivia FCYTravis 19:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 19:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, trivia. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 22:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not an indescriminate collection of information. --Revolución (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Revolucoin Batmanand 22:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as pointless collection of information. My general criteria for lists is, "Can you make useful correlations about the members of this list?" In this case, the answer is no. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 00:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pointless list. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As arbitrary a subject as they come. Wisco 07:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as trivia. Essexmutant 15:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.