The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Axial Higgs boson[edit]

Axial Higgs boson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just bad PR from one not so significant paper that trolled for publicity. Peter Woit explains this better than I: [1]. Anyway, just because someone publishes an abstract with a buzzword no one else uses is not a reason for a Wikipedia article. No SIGCOV here. Mvqr (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.