The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Wafulz 21:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baller[edit]

This is an article about the slang term "baller", it is unsourced, and therefore violates Wikipedia:Attribution. The slang term obviously exists, but unless there is enough sourced content on this to write an article, this should be deleted/redirected somewhere, as it's already been transwikied to Wiktionary Xyzzyplugh 17:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Instructions to source should be added to this good attempt at an article about an important slang term. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang. Belongs in Wiktionary. Edison 19:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a terminal dicdef; apparently it's already in Wiktionary. szyslak (t, c) 20:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, more than a dicdef. Abeg92contribs 15:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:Attribution does not make an exception for "more than a dicdef". Articles where reliable sources can't be found, even if they are "more than a dicdef", still do not belong. Have you found any? --Xyzzyplugh 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless some serious reliable sources are added pronto. PubliusFL 04:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If reliable sources are found that discuss the term then it can be recreated per WP:NEO. Mike Christie (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.