The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is to delete - the newly found source does not appear to be accepted as sufficient to 'keep' PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bela-Vista (football club)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a football club from Sao Tome & Principe which (as far as I can see) didn't play for the national cup or the country's top division. Appears to fail WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. – Kosm1 fent 09:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Kosm1 fent 09:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG, and no verified sporting claim to notability either. Giant Snowman 10:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. In the absence of any refnerences or any other indication of significant coverage, this article clearly fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability. Haven't played in the top league or the cup, so fails WP:FOOTYN Mentoz86 (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - played in the preliminaries of the national cup in 2001 and 2003. See rsssf.com. - FakirNL (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The above link demonstrates that the club is notable and meets ~~WP:GNG and~~ WP:FOOTYN. League Octopus (League Octopus 18:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)).[reply]
- How does it meet GNG? FOOTYN yes, but GNG no. – Kosm1 fent 18:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I have notified the users who !voted delete, so they can change their !votes. If they do, I will withdraw the nomination. (however I could let it run off, 7 days have already passed... eh whatever) – Kosm1 fent 18:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it technically meets a WikiProject's essay - but one that is certainly not fit for purpose. This article doesn't meet GNG, and even the sporting 'achievements' are nothing of note. My !vote remains the same, I'm afraid. Giant Snowman 19:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I will endeavour to make it "fit for purpose". League Octopus {League Octopus 19:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.